The data showed is gathered inside the framework away from wide research strategies, which consisted of reveal sociodemographic and dating analysis, and also other balances in range out of close relationship
According to overall lifetime of the connection, the typical, in many years, toward more statuses datingranking.net/escort-directory/houston revealed try, respectively: dos.89 (SD = 2.27); 4.94 (SD = dos.97), both communities varying between six months and you may 11 years of relationships; eight.76 (SD = cuatro.01), anywhere between a few and you may 19 years; and you may (SD = 4.82), anywhere between below per year and you can 30 many years. 8%) and stayed that have nearest and dearest, when you find yourself the individuals managing their couples were mostly performing anyone (69.2%), of which 53% got university otherwise postgraduate stages. Of your own formal relationship professionals, 67% had school or blog post-graduate level, where 89.8% had been operating, 2% retired and you may 8.2% unemployed. The working problem to the partnered professionals are comparable: 89.5% have been doing work, dos.9% was in fact resigned and six.3% was basically out of work, and step 1.3% known various other a job reputation. Inside classification, 62.5% of your own members had school or postgraduate amount.
Private connection try evaluated with respect to the Portuguese version (Dining table step 1) of one’s shorter sort of this new Dedication Scale (Stanley, 1986), which had been interpreted depending on the following the translation and you can retroversion actions: after permission was given because of the journalist, the original measure was interpreted because of the a couple of experts in the field, both of these translations was basically subjected to retroversion by the one or two positives, you to definitely bilingual plus one experienced in the usage of the newest English language; in the end, for every single adaptation was compared to the amazing scale, opting for using new terms and conditions and you can facts which have better proximity to help you it. New Portuguese type for this reason consisted of the fresh new 14 brand-new activities and the same address size and you will is named, shortly after deliberation of the class, the private Partnership Measure (‚Escala de Compromisso Pessoal’–ECP). To the last phase of your own translation procedure, the appliance is given to 3 participants on the goal of guaranteeing the newest adequateness of one’s vocabulary therefore the unambiguous knowledge of stuff, that happen to be talked about into the people shortly after application of new questionnaire. Since there have been zero comments saying if you don’t, those things remained a comparable.
As a consequence of a change of your modern Davis (1996, quoted inside the Lind, 2008) level, which appliance is intended to scale relationships high quality feeling, with the expectation that, according to the theoretical assumptions, both balances usually seriously correlate
Relationship Quality, chosen to verify criteria validity, was measured with the Relationship Rating Form–Revised (RRF-R; Davis, 1996, adapt. by Lind, 2008). The items are presented in the form of questions that the subjects will answer according to a rating scale of 1 (not at all) to 9 (completely or extremely). The Portuguese version consists of a total of 46 items grouped in four dimensions: Passion, Confidence, Conflict and Intimacy. The RRF-R revealed psychometric properties ranging from good to excellent, obtaining an excellent internal consistency at the total scale level, with Cronbach’s alpha values between .97 and .98, for women and men respectively, and .81 and .97 at subscale level, a good temporal stability (significant correlations ranging between .70 and .87; p < .01) and high concurrent validity with a marital satisfaction scale (significant global score correlations between .88 and .85, for women and men respectively; p < .01). In the current sample, the RRF-R presented for the total scale, an excellent Cronbach's alpha of .96; .94 for the Passion subscale, .93 for Confidence, .77 for Conflict and .83 for Intimacy. The internal consistency of the total scale remained excellent for the four subsamples: .95 for participants in a dating relationship, .94 for those in a dating relationship with cohabitation and .97 for participants in both formal unions and married relationships.
Comments (0)